§ 22.36.066. Implementation of master plan.

A.

The hearings examiner shall review the status of development pursuant to the adopted review schedule. Review shall occur not less than once every five years until substantially complete development of the planned unit development is accomplished.

B.

If the hearings examiner finds that substantial completion of development projected for a given review phase has been accomplished, and that development has met and is projected to meet the terms and intent of the master plan and other applicable plans and policies, the hearings examiner may authorize the subsequent phase. If the hearings examiner finds that these criteria have not been met, the hearings examiner may extend the period for completion of that phase or terminate master plan approval for subsequent phases. In determining whether to extend or terminate, the hearings examiner shall consider the reasons completion has not occurred and whether the public interest would be best served by extension or termination.

C.

Site plans, subdivisions and other specific development actions, when consistent with the provisions of the master plan, shall be approved through the standard process for the type of application being made. These actions shall be taken concurrent with or subsequent to approval of the master plan and may accompany development of the site in phases. Review of such actions shall be subject to the laws and regulations which would be applicable to such an action regardless of its inclusion within a planned unit development.

D.

The master plan shall remain valid throughout project build-out as long as the review by the hearings examiner finds that the development is in substantial compliance with the master plan.

(Ord. 13040 Attach. I (part), 2003)